Atlantic City’s Borgata Casino will redistribute competition winnings following a major chip-cheating scandal that rocked the Borgata Winter Poker Open in January. (Image: ac2lv.com)
This new Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) has reached a resolution regarding the Borgata Winter Poker Open chips that are counterfeit at last. The competition was suspended on January eighteenth, and afterwards cancelled, following revelation that the poker that is fake had been introduced.
The DGE certainly had their work cut out in reaching an equitable solution to a very sticky problem: when play was stopped, there have been 27 players left of 4,824 initial entrants into the $500 + 60 NLH Big Stack event, which had a guaranteed award pool of $2 million. Even though the perpetrator of this scam, a one-time chip leader named Christian Lusardi, actually busted on Day 2 for $6,814, it ended up beingn’t simply a matter of confiscating his ill-gotten winnings and paying the bubble kid.
Detectives had to ascertain which players among this field that is huge be believed to have been adversely affected by the cheating and find a good way to distribute an overall total of $1,721,805 to those who deserved it. That includes $1,433,145 in prize money, along with $288,720 the Borgata collected in registration fees. This also meant attempting to quantify the intangible ‘ripple effect’ that Lusardi’s scam could have caused; a almost impossible task.
The DGE decided that 2143 entrants whom failed to money had been entitled to their money back (buy-in plus reg fee). These included all players who played on Day 1a from 10am, apart from those that started in the occasion Center and were eliminated before 4:30pm, since the latter group could not need enter into connection with Lusardi. Since it was a reentry tournament, Lusardi was also playing on Day 1b, having busted Day 1a, and thus all players who played that day from 10am are eligible, aside from those who played in the Signature Room and Poker Room. Meanwhile, the $50,893 in rewards owed to players who busted within the cash shall be paid as scheduled, while the residual 27 players still ‘in’ will chop the others for $19,323 each.
While this would appear to be the fairest solution given the circumstances, the Borgata may still have headache to cope with. In February, a class-action lawsuit was filed by brand New Jersey attorney Bruce Li Causi with respect to one of many players, Jacob Mustere. The lawsuit claimed that players ought to be liable to damages along with refunds. During the time of writing, it just isn’t known whether Causi’s customer is content with the settlement that is current.
Money Down the Could
Meanwhile, Lusardi stays in jail in brand New Jersey on $300,000 relationship, waiting for trial. He was arrested after attempting to flush 2.7 million in fake tournament chips down the toilet of his accommodation at the nearby Harrah’s Resort. This resulted in the pipes becoming clogged, which caused water to drip down into the rooms of guests on the floor below. He can be charged with running a large-scale pirate DVD procedure from his North Carolina home that allegedly grossed over $1 million.
The Borgata has since introduced new high-tech poker chips that are more intricately designed, making them harder to counterfeit, and that can be examined under ultraviolet light.
Everett May Purchase Land for Wynn Casino
Will the town of Everett buy this site of the former Monsanto chemical plant for Wynn Everett? Mayor Carlo DeMaria hopes so. (Image: wcvb.com)
It appears that every time an obstacle emerges for just one of the proposed Massachusetts casino plans, someone or something measures up to provide a solution. Then when there have been questions regarding that would benefit from the sale of land Wynn Resorts would use to host their Everett casino, possibly we should have expected an answer to too present itself before long.
Eminent Domain Buy Considered
In this situation, the city of Everett itself may eventually find the property before offering it to Wynn, sidestepping the murky situation that currently surrounds the land sale. The city would use their power of eminent domain to purchase the land in addition to seven other properties in the area for a price that is total of $41 million. The land necessary for the casino could be sold to then Wynn from the city.
According to Mayor Carlo DeMaria, this move wouldn’t be solely for the advantage of Steve Wynn and the casino that is potential he would like to build. Instead, this is a plan that has been in development before anyone considered bringing gambling to the town.
‘This area, as you are well aware, is important to the future success of this entire city and certainly will serve being a gateway towards the entire region,’ DeMaria had written in a letter to Everett city councilors final week. ‘My management is committed to realizing the potential that is extraordinary of area and the city as being a whole.’
Controversy Over Secret Partners
Even though the city may be willing to purchase the land in order to develop it, that wasn’t the original proposal Wynn was banking on. They decided to purchase the land for $35 million, presuming that the Massachusetts Gaming Commission was to approve their casino plan.
As we recently reported, the controversy within the land began after payment investigators discovered that the current owners of the property FBT Everett Realty could be lying about the involvement of Charles Lightbody, one of their original partners. Lightbody, a convicted felon, claimed to own sold off his interest in the property long ago, despite having put up $1 million for the original $8 million purchase price in 2009.
That could have been resolved if the other owners had pledged that the property sale wouldn’t benefit any unknown, secret lovers. By Anthony Gattineri has refused to sign such a pledge, fueling speculation that Lightbody may have an interest. And because the commission has required the statements become signed in order to approve Wynn’s license, this has put the sale in question.
A Public Purpose?
Issue of whether or not the populous city of Everett could possibly get surrounding this issue by using eminent domain might be tricky. The city can only take private land if doing so serves a public purpose under state law. Mayor DeMaria claims the land is ideal for redevelopment and that the populous city would invest tens of millions to upgrade the location after the purchase.
But perhaps not everyone is convinced that anyone would develop the certain area if Wynn doesn’t get the casino permit. City Council president Michael Marchese says he looks at the proposition as nothing less than an opt to Wynn.
‘We haven’t possessed a developer here in over 20 years,’ Marchese said. ‘We only understand what we hear, and what we hear we don’t trust.’
Illinois Rep Bob Rita OffersTwo Plans for Chicago Casino Expansion
Will Illinois legislators approve either of Rep. Bob Rita’s land gaming proposals? The jury’s still down. (Image: chicagotribune.com)
You can imagine how lucrative a massive casino put in Chicago could become. It’s been a fantasy of many for a long time now, though never ever one that has come anywhere near fruition. Now, one lawmaker has placed two proposals for such a casino before an Illinois House committee though the probability of either ultimately passing into legislation are slim at best.
Two Plans, One Man
Representative Bob Rita (D-Blue Island) has put together two variations of a plan that could bring casino gambling to Chicago. In the version that is first designed to appease as much interest groups as you are able to, five new gambling enterprises would be authorized. That would add a Chicago casino with up to 4,000 games, along side smaller casinos in Rockford, Danville, Lake County and another suburb to the south of Chicago. It might also give racetracks the proper to host a varying number of slot machines, up to 600 for locations in Cook County.
But that is not the plan that received the attention of the Illinois home. It’s an alternative Rita-backed plan one that would accept just an individual casino with up to 10,000 games in Chicago that promised to cause plenty of heated arguments on both sides of the problem.
Chicago vs. Downstate Illinois
Rita is hoping that by talking to lawmakers, he can convince them that an enormous Chicago casino will gain the whole state. His plan would see half of all revenues from the casino that is proposed projects through the state.
‘It’s part of the means of moving this ahead,’ Rita stated before the hearing. ‘ We now have never ever had the full in-depth conversation or a hearing of the Chicago-only option.’
The single-venue plan is favored by the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, which said during the hearing that they would like a casino in the main part of downtown Chicago. 888 casino 88â‚¬ Governor Pat Quinn has also suggested that this version of the bill is more likely to earn his support than previous bills that he has vetoed.
But politicians from the rest of the continuing state are predictably dubious of any plan that would expand gambling just within the city.
‘The purpose [of gambling expansion] would be to help communities that are economically distressed’ said state Representative Chad Hays (R-Catlin). ‘ I would personally suggest that downstate taking the leftover crumbs from Chicago is really a laughable assertion that no downstater would bite on.’
A Term from the Mayor
Danville Mayor Scott Eisenhauer also weighed in against a plan that is chicago-only.
‘The possibility to add downstate job creation and revenue growth far outweighs the benefits of a license that is chicago-only’ said Eisenhauer, who also planned to go to the hearings.
Representatives from social groups talked at the hearings to say that they were focused on the impact a massive casino would have in the state. Meanwhile, other casinos worried that a large place in Chicago would harm their businesses. And the horse industry that is racing both the single-casino and broader expansion plans, because they want even more slots available at their tracks.
With so much opposition from across the state, many lawmakers feel that just a wider gambling bill has any potential for success.